802.11 and swiss cheese

Contact:http://www.packetnexus.com

802.11 and swiss cheese
By Stephan Somogyi, 
April 16, 2001
URL:
http://www.zdnetasia.com/biztech/security/story/0,2000010816,20196487,00
.htm


There is no doubt that 802.11b - the technical name for products also
known as AirPort, Orinoco, Aironet, et al- is a life-changing
technology. 

All of a sudden companies don't have to string as many cables through
their offices to provide connectivity. Small offices, home offices, and
even just plain homes, are all beneficiaries as well, since you can set
up an access point somewhere in the house, ideally hidden from plain
sight, and still engage in e-mail and wander around the Web. 

YES 

The problem is that, unlike a piece of cable that you have to get
physical access to in order to connect, it's comparatively easy to get
near enough to a wireless access point to get good signal strength. Say,
in a café across the street. 

OK, but just because you're in the radio footprint of an access point
doesn't mean you can do anything useful with that wireless network,
right? Well, maybe. 

Placebo
Even the most user-friendly access points come with basic security
facilities. These security features give the appearance of protecting a
wireless network in two ways: making the traffic that flies through the
ether undecipherable by outsiders and making the access point, well,
inaccessible to anyone unauthorized. 

The encryption part is accomplished by defining a password that the
access point and all its clients share. One known weakness is that the
encryption scheme--called WEP--uses a key length of 40 bits, so it's
well behind the state of the art. However, I wouldn't be nearly so
perturbed if one really needed to brute force attack the full key
length. One doesn't. 

But wait, there's more. It also turns out that the parts of 802.11's
security not related to encryption are also flawed and can be
compromised. In short, even if you put all three available security
mechanisms--WEP encryption, MAC-based access control, and closed
networks--a smart and determined evildoer can still compromise your
network.


At least as far back as last October, the IEEE 802.11 committee knew
about the security flaws in 802.11 and was starting work to fix them.
Earlier this year, researchers with the Isaac project at UC Berkeley
publicized quite a few problems with WEP. Upon reviewing this work and
the design of 802.11's security, respected Bell Labs security researcher
Steven Bellovin was quoted in the Wall Street Journal on February 5th as
saying that there were some "real howlers" in the design. 

WECA, the Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance, promptly issued a
formal response after the Berkeley researchers announced their findings.
Unfortunately, this response evoked little more than the lightbulb joke
whose punchline is "none--they redefine darkness as the standard." The
response spent more time focusing on semantic quibbles and how hard it
is to perform the attacks than admitting there were fundamental flaws in
the protocol in the first place. 

Adding to the UC Berkeley findings, a group of researchers at the
University of Maryland published a paper of their own outlining even
more vulnerabilities in 802.11. 

Both the quality and quantity of examination of 802.11's security leaves
little doubt about its significant shortcomings.


It's worth pointing out these many vulnerabilities that make 802.11's
security reminiscent of swiss cheese are manageable now that they're
understood. There can no longer be any false sense of security. 

It requires a determined attacker to put si